We have competing values in education. We want our kids to be motivated creative and innovative. At the same time we want them to succeed in assessments that are anything but motivating, creative and innovative.
The assessments always win, perhaps because we're obssessed with numbers and international comparisons... Are we first, eleventh? In what?
We need to rethink our assessments to represent what we value otherwise we are doomed to marginalize arts, foreign languages, design, enterprenuership. Marginalize them to magnet school and rogue teachers who find places to teach as they believe they should, half hiding, always defensive- totally right!
Saturday, November 13, 2010
Tuesday, November 9, 2010
Arts Integration in a Preservice Class- log
In my literacy methods class we went through an accelerated Arts LINC cycle today. We started with a Taylor Mali poem- reminding everyone that poems are often meant to be read out loud. We then proceeded to poetryfoundation.org where each student chose a Thanksgiving poem (their search engine is awesome and now they have a ipod app).
Students joined with1-3 others who chose the same poem and practiced reading it out loud (mini readers theatre). Then we followed up by creating visual art based on the poem- using pastels. The results were stunning and diverse. After the art was completed each student generated 5 vocabulary words (no one cent or nickel words please) to describe the art (and not the poem). Finally they used the words to create a poem describing their art.
Results wer engagement, achievement and deep understanding. We finished with a few minutes of research results from Arts LINC long live arts integration.
It's the first time I've had this much fun with this group.
Students joined with1-3 others who chose the same poem and practiced reading it out loud (mini readers theatre). Then we followed up by creating visual art based on the poem- using pastels. The results were stunning and diverse. After the art was completed each student generated 5 vocabulary words (no one cent or nickel words please) to describe the art (and not the poem). Finally they used the words to create a poem describing their art.
Results wer engagement, achievement and deep understanding. We finished with a few minutes of research results from Arts LINC long live arts integration.
It's the first time I've had this much fun with this group.
Wednesday, October 13, 2010
Thinking about Long-Term change in teaching
This fall two grants that I have evaluated came to a close. ArtsLINC and Reading First. They could not have been more different from each other is some very foundamental ways. Reading First was a top down federal initiatives while ArtsLINC was a local bottom up effort.
In rReading First professional development was mandated and practices were regulated, in ArtsLINC we sat with teachers to define what how and when they would like innovate and integrate the arts. both grants had exceptional leadership, adequate resources and a well designed professional development.
The progress in both grants have been very different. Reading First had immediate impact on the way Reading was taught, however, after the initial impact very little has changed in subsequent iterations. there were small incremental improvements to teacher practice and very little change in student outcomes.
ArtsLINC on the other hand had a very slow start changes in teacher practice and student achievement lagged. Overtime just like Reading First slowed down ArtsLINC picked up and the change in teacher practice became more pronounced. If you're looking for a quick fix go with the Top Down approach, that seems to be the way we are headed as a nation. If, however, you'd like to have long lasting impact then choose the long and tedious road. The difference is rooted in teacher agency, efficacy and development.
In rReading First professional development was mandated and practices were regulated, in ArtsLINC we sat with teachers to define what how and when they would like innovate and integrate the arts. both grants had exceptional leadership, adequate resources and a well designed professional development.
The progress in both grants have been very different. Reading First had immediate impact on the way Reading was taught, however, after the initial impact very little has changed in subsequent iterations. there were small incremental improvements to teacher practice and very little change in student outcomes.
ArtsLINC on the other hand had a very slow start changes in teacher practice and student achievement lagged. Overtime just like Reading First slowed down ArtsLINC picked up and the change in teacher practice became more pronounced. If you're looking for a quick fix go with the Top Down approach, that seems to be the way we are headed as a nation. If, however, you'd like to have long lasting impact then choose the long and tedious road. The difference is rooted in teacher agency, efficacy and development.
Friday, October 8, 2010
Time to Smile
Much of what I've been doing lately was griping. Griping about how we're headed down the wrong path, about the politics and about "Waiting for superman".
I have decided to stop griping and move on. There is much to do and many places and people to work with in wonderful ways.
I think part of my gripe comes from our much less intense artsLINC group. The grant is over and we are finishing up the report. I miss the interaction and the sense of something exciting is happening with a group of dedicated professionals. The truth is that I need to snap
Out of it, smile and remember that all of us are still in education and as long as we are there is great hope.
So No, I am not Waiting for Superman.
Integration of the arts technology and different subject matter is happening, will happen because in the 21st century we must be all connected, all integrated if we are to be full global citizens.
I have decided to stop griping and move on. There is much to do and many places and people to work with in wonderful ways.
I think part of my gripe comes from our much less intense artsLINC group. The grant is over and we are finishing up the report. I miss the interaction and the sense of something exciting is happening with a group of dedicated professionals. The truth is that I need to snap
Out of it, smile and remember that all of us are still in education and as long as we are there is great hope.
So No, I am not Waiting for Superman.
Integration of the arts technology and different subject matter is happening, will happen because in the 21st century we must be all connected, all integrated if we are to be full global citizens.
Saturday, September 4, 2010
Art Technology and Integration
Recently I had a conversation with a technology coordinator from our local school district. We had a great conversation. At the core though the problems we were discussing in technology integration mirrored similar conversations I've had about Arts integration.
At the end of the day technology is considered as nice but not necessary with most teachers ignoring it.
Instead of integrating most schools employ or nominate a technology teachers often actually reducing the chance of true integration into the curriculum.
As she described what works in technology integration it was very similar to our own growing understanding of connecting to the currculum, fostering technical expertise and providing support for real needs on an ongoing basis.
At the end of the day technology is considered as nice but not necessary with most teachers ignoring it.
Instead of integrating most schools employ or nominate a technology teachers often actually reducing the chance of true integration into the curriculum.
As she described what works in technology integration it was very similar to our own growing understanding of connecting to the currculum, fostering technical expertise and providing support for real needs on an ongoing basis.
Saturday, June 5, 2010
The Immutability of Schooling Practices
It's been awhile since I posted, so I am a little rusty. At AERA I went (among other things) to listen to Michael Cole in a distinguished lecture. I will not claim to present this complex talk in a blog posting. The essence as I perceived it was to say that schooling is a persistent institution not just in goals but in practices, norms, and rituals. In challenging the view of modern schooling as a result of industrial modes of production, he claimed (with evidence) that these modes of instruction are as old as literacy itself.
Faced with this notion of immutability, schooling has a clear and constant structure, I was forced to ask myself: How can we then engage with arts integration and its implications for the classroom (exploration, ownership, professionalism) as educational reform.? We know that as a wide phenomena we are doomed to fail. At best we can insert ideas from our practice to standards that then will be narrowly and mechanically interpreted by many.
Here too Cole provides an answer. He claims that only major social change in goals and dispositions that redefines the way we interact with each others, with other living things and the planet. Our job then is to create ideas and practices that will continue existing in small pockets- waiting for such social change giving future education options and choices to follow.
Faced with this notion of immutability, schooling has a clear and constant structure, I was forced to ask myself: How can we then engage with arts integration and its implications for the classroom (exploration, ownership, professionalism) as educational reform.? We know that as a wide phenomena we are doomed to fail. At best we can insert ideas from our practice to standards that then will be narrowly and mechanically interpreted by many.
Here too Cole provides an answer. He claims that only major social change in goals and dispositions that redefines the way we interact with each others, with other living things and the planet. Our job then is to create ideas and practices that will continue existing in small pockets- waiting for such social change giving future education options and choices to follow.
Saturday, April 17, 2010
AERA is Approaching
So I thought I would pick some of the sessions related to arts integration that looked interesting to me.
Hope to see y'all there.
1. Artful and Creative Processes as Modes for Teaching and Learning
Hope to see y'all there.
1. Artful and Creative Processes as Modes for Teaching and Learning
Unit: SIG-Arts and Learning | |||
Session Submission type: Paper Session | |||
| |||
Unit: SIG-Arts and Learning | |||
Session Submission type: Roundtable Session | |||
| |||
Unit: SIG-Arts and Learning | |||
Session Submission type: Paper Session | |||
| |||
Unit: SIG-Arts and Learning | |||
Session Submission type: Paper Session | |||
| |||
Unit: SIG-Bilingual Education Research | |||
Session Submission type: Symposium | |||
| |||
Descriptors: English Learner, Arts Education, ESL/ENL | |||
Unit: SIG-Critical Perspectives on Early Childhood Education | |||
Session Submission type: Roundtable Session | |||
|
Unit: Division G - Social Context of Education | |||
Sub Unit: Section 1: Local Contexts of Teaching and Learning | |||
Session Submission type: Roundtable Session | |||
| |||
Unit: SIG-Arts and Learning | |||
Session Submission type: Roundtable Session | |||
| |||
Unit: SIG-Indigenous Peoples of the Americas | |||
Session Submission type: Roundtable Session | |||
| |||
Descriptors: Indigenous Peoples, Arts Education, Social Context | |||
Unit: Division K - Teaching and Teacher Education | |||
Sub Unit: Section 7 | |||
Session Submission type: Roundtable Session | |||
| |||
Unit: SIG-Arts and Learning | |||
Session Submission type: Symposium | |||
| |||
Descriptors: Arts Education, Adolescence, Early Childhood | |||
Unit: Division K - Teaching and Teacher Education | |||
Sub Unit: Section 2 | |||
Session Submission type: Roundtable Session | |||
| |||
Unit: SIG-Arts and Learning | |||
Session Submission type: Symposium | |||
| |||
Descriptors: Arts Education, Social Change, Communities | |||
Unit: SIG-Arts and Learning | |||
Session Submission type: Roundtable Session | |||
| |||
15. New Teacher Induction: Promising and Innovative Practices for Support, Development, and Leadership
Unit: SIG-Research on Teacher Induction | |||
Session Submission type: Roundtable Session | |||
|
Unit: Division C - Learning and Instruction | |||
Sub Unit: Section 5: Learning Environments | |||
Session Submission type: Poster Session | |||
|
Unit: SIG-Arts and Learning | |||
Session Submission type: Paper Session | |||
| |||
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)